Source: http://www.midlandepc.co.uk/ |
‘Average UK private home rents have increased 7.5% in the last 12 months while national average earnings now rising at 1.7%. The average cost of renting a home in the UK has risen more than four times as quickly as national average incomes, according to new findings released today from the May 2014 HomeLet Rental Index’
Source: http://www.rostons.co.uk/ |
‘Soaring numbers of people in private rented homes face eviction despite being up to date with their rent because rising house prices are prompting landlords to ask tenants to leave. In the last year, Citizens Advice Bureaux has seen a 38 per cent increase in desperate tenants coping with the threat of eviction even though they have no rent arrears, according to figures seen by the Independent.
More than 5,000 of these cases were reported to
Citizens Advice in 2013-14, up from 3,750 the previous year – and as the
housing shortage reaches critical levels, the figures show how increasingly
precarious the situation is for renters.
Eviction by private landlords is the most common
cause of homelessness encountered by Citizens Advice, causing one in 10 of the
80,000 problems with homelessness the charity saw in the last year.
Tenants report being evicted following a request to
carry out repairs, because the landlord wants to sell their home, or because
rents are suddenly hiked to unaffordable levels’
Tenants have statutory protection
under a raft of legislation such as the Rent Act 1977, Housing Act 1985,
Housing Act 1988, depending on the type of tenancy, and the Landlord &
Tenant 1985 in terms of obligations and responsibilities to carry out repairs.
It does appear that Landlords are choosing to ignore their statutory responsibilities
in increasing numbers in order to chase higher rental yields. So what can a tenant do in these circumstances?
I am regularly contacted by people who
experience difficulty, sometimes silence when contacting their landlord to
carry out repairs. In nearly all cases this involves private sector
Landlords who for some reason think that if they ignore their tenants for long
enough then they will just go away. The issue of course is that the
Tenant has rights and the Landlord has responsibilities under a whole raft of
legislation (as indicated above)) and vice versa. In the event that a Landlord fails to carry out
repairs for which he/she is responsible, a tenant can take action to remedy the
situation. The problem becomes magnified if the repair that is necessary is
something that may be dangerous or posing a health risk to the occupants.
Source: http://www.latentexistence.me.uk/ |
In my early career as a Building Surveyor I
undertook a number inspections on behalf of Solicitors who had been appointed
by Tenants where complaints had been made about living conditions and in
particular habitation standards in their homes. In those days a Surveyors
report would be used as evidence that a landlord had breached their duty under legislation
such as section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 or Public Health Acts
such as the Environmental Protection Act 1990 or others. In order to assess
fitness for habitation at the time a Surveyor would consider the requirements
of something known as the ‘fitness standard’ under section 604 of the Housing
Act 1985. Nowadays an assessment of the health
& safety of a dwelling is considered under a much wider context under the
Housing Health & Safety Rating System 2006 (HHSRS). A tenant can contact their Local Authority
and request an inspection under HHSRS if they feel that there are health,
safety or habitation issues. The Local
Authority has enforcement powers under HHSRS where category 1 hazards are
identified. For more information on
HHSRS refer to my previous article (Link)
Nobody wants to go through a
legal process as this can be time consuming and expensive. Ultimately, however this is one form of
recourse that may be considered in which the tenant will effectively try to
force the landlord to meet their statutory obligations through the courts. In most cases tenants will not want to take
this option as costs (money, time and stress), will be deemed to negatively
outweigh the benefit that could be attained if successful. Note the word ‘if’, because there is never
any guarantees that legal proceedings will succeed. Although legal action
should be used as a last resort this is nevertheless an option that a tenant may
utilise.
Better regulation, particularly
of private landlords is essential to addressing some of the issues considered
above. Rather than dilly dally around
with suggestions the Government should introduce a landlord registration scheme
such as that introduced in Northern Ireland earlier this year. Under the scheme all private landlords are
required to register under the Scheme and it is an offence to commence a new
let of a residential property under a private tenancy without being registered.
In the rest of the UK there are currently a number of voluntary registration
schemes however the fact that they are not mandatory will mean that those who
are likely to cut corners or do not meet their responsibilities are hardly
likely to sign up! Therefore this is
something that has to become mandatory through legislation. Mandatory registration schemes can state minimum levels of
service that tenants should expect including transparent fees, improved
property conditions, better communication between landlords and tenants,
improved response times for repairs and maintenance and protected deposits. If all private landlords are required by law to
meet these requirements then they will be made to think twice about the manner
in which they deal with their tenants.
Please feel
free to share this article and other articles on this site with friends,
family and colleagues who you think would be interested
Information/opinions
posted on this site are the personal views of the author and should not be
relied upon by any person or any third party without first seeking further
professional advice. Also, please scroll down and read the copyright
notice at the end of the blog.
Another great article and I totally agree with its observations.
ReplyDeleteOne of the continual statements made by the landlord bodies is that licencing will penalise the good landlords and let the others continue unpunished.
However, the idea behind licensing as per the Rugg Review was to also raise the visibility of those that continue to practice 'under the radar'. No license would raise the question as to why the landlord did not have one, thereby educating the tenant market that production/proof of a licence was part of the whole renting process.
Licencing continues to be adopted by more and more councils including my own, that of the London Borough of Waltham Forest and I will not hestate in providing the names of all of the landlords on my block should any not comply.
I already use HHSRS legislation on behalf of tenants when landlords fail to meet their obligations which appears to have improved the operations of those who were reported but it is a slow process and requires constant monitoring.
Another issue is that of many teants not having English as their first language, which is another reason I am constantly called upon for assistance.
I am by the way a leasehold manager not a renting landlord but with 18 of the 22 flats sublet, my role has shfted considerably to the PRS side.
These sectors straddle each other and if you add the role of councils placing the homeless into the sector and failing to carry out due diligence on the landlord and the needs of the prospective tenant (some come here with drink, drugs and anti-social behavour issues) then my role continues to increase in its complexities.
Myself and my partner (the freeholder) have managed to reverse a number of situations but not without tremendous personal strain incuding physical assaults and false arrests but we have no choice when those that should be dealing with their tenants and their properties fail to do so.
I can also use leasehold legislation for some of our actions but as I've already mentioned, both the leasehold and the PRS cross over each other and failure to operate professionaly as a landlord means failure to operate within the terms of the lease.
Forfeiture however is often a non-starter due to a) financial constraints b) the terms of the lease) and c) the issue of waiver which can string any process out for much longer than it needs to thereby putting option a) back into play.
So, if renting is to be the way forward, then lets see some more progress into making ALL of it 'fit for purpose' because as a former tenant myself with a really good landlord and agent for the last 7 years of my renting life, I have certainly seen how well the sector can actually work!