Never be tempted to cut
corners when considering the purchase of a property because even if you think a
building survey is expensive …… it often proves to be much more expensive not
to have one
Source: http://www.buildingcommission.com.au/ |
In my
last article I discussed the limitations of a survey that would be instructed
by a mortgage lender (a valuation survey) and how a purchaser should not rely
on this as means of assessing the condition of a building. This is because the primary purpose of this
type of survey is to establish the value of a property and to be confident that
in the event of any default on behalf of the borrower, that the lender can
re-coup what they are owed. The
objectives of a purchaser however are very different in that they want to be
satisfied that the building they plan to buy, and often live in, is not
concealing anything that they are not aware of.
I say ‘not aware of’ as it is perfectly feasible and acceptable to proceed
with the purchase of a building as long as you are fully aware of any potential
issues/problems. Let’s face it,
buildings, particularly older buildings are highly unlikely to be free from
defects and in fact many of us will accept buildings with issues/problems at a
lower price, as a way of trying to get a bargain, this is particularly true of
property developers.
Not all
of us are property developers and the vast amount of residential property
transactions that take place each year are by members of the public who in many
cases have little to no knowledge of buildings and therefore rely on
professional guidance. It would
therefore seem sensible, particularly due to the large investment involved that
prospective purchasers commission a survey so that they can establish if there
are any issues/problems with the building they are considering buying. However,
you may be surprised to learn that the vast majority of purchasers choose to
ignore this very important part of the purchase process. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors
(RICS) recently reported:
‘Results from an RICS’ survey of home buying consumers, released today, show that many homeowners who did not take out a home survey are left with a property they regret buying and an average of £5,750 in repair bills. The survey of 1,017 buyers across the UK found that consumers are clearly aware of the need for independent advice, with 94% of respondents agreeing it is important to commission a survey. However, nearly a third failed to do so. This means buyers are left ignorant of issues with the property, such as structural defects, dry and wet rot, subsidence and many other faults, only for these to become serious matters at a later date. The new homeowner may then be unable to afford, or may lose the desire, to fix the faults and may be left with a property they may no longer want to live in but are unable to sell to recoup their losses.’Over a third of those surveyed failed to have an independent survey commissioned. We could speculate on why, however as 94% of respondents agreed that it was important to commission a survey, I think it is reasonable to discount ignorance as the primary reason for this. I suspect that cost may be a contributing factor, where many prospective purchasers see this as a cost they can do without and hope that they ‘get lucky’ and purchase a property with no issues/defects, that they were not aware of. However, trying to save money at this point is a false economy. True, a comprehensive residential building survey may cost on average between £700 and £1000 (costs will vary depending upon the size and complexity of a dwelling and the survey selected), however, this is always money well spent. In fact purchasers should be asking themselves if they can afford not to have a building survey undertaken rather than thinking about how much they will save by not having one done.
Source: http://www.rics.org/
Source: http://www.jscp.co.uk/ |
A level 3 Building Survey (see below), will provide a prospective purchaser with a comprehensive assessment of a dwelling and highlight not just significant issues, but anything that the Surveyor thinks is relevant. Armed with this information, the prospective purchaser may decide you try to negotiate the sale price with the seller (to reflect the findings of the survey) or maybe even decide to discontinue their interest and look for alternative properties. Either way, the information provides the purchaser with choices, where decisions can be made before contracts are signed rather than having to deal with the consequences when the property comes into their legal ownership. I am sure that in hindsight many of those who took part in the RICS research above would have regretted not spending £700 to £1000 on a Building Survey, as they ended up with an average repair bill of nearly £6000. Never be tempted to cut corners when considering the purchase of a property because even if you think a building survey is expensive you can see from above that it often proves to be much more expensive not to have one. On the flip side, the Building Survey may not identify any significant issues. Even in this scenario this represents good value for money as you now have piece of mind that the property you are considering is in reasonable condition and you are likely to avoid any nasty surprises. The lesson here is very simple: Always commission a Building Survey before exchanging contracts!
The information provided
by RICS below summaries three different levels of survey that you may consider
when purchasing a dwelling: RICS surveys are available to suit the particular circumstances
of the client and the property:
Level 1 - Condition Report
Provides an objective overview of the
condition of the property, highlighting areas of major concern without
extensive detail. This option is ideal for buyers purchasing a modern house in
good condition and for sellers and owners.
Level 2 - HomeBuyer Report
Is most suitable for standard older
and modern properties that are in an apparent reasonable condition. It provides
a concise report with advice detailing any significant problems that could make
a difference to the value of a property.
Level 3 - Building Survey
The ‘flagship’ service providing a
detailed report on a property. It is particularly useful for older, larger or
non-traditional properties, or one which is dilapidated and has been
extensively altered or if the buyer is planning a major conversion or
renovation.
Source: http://www.rics.org/
Please feel free to share this article
and other articles on this site with friends, family and colleagues who
you think would be interested
Before going to buy a property there are many things that you should have to check many thing and take a survey of a market as well as property.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is that many house purchasers are already stretched to find the resources for the purchase itself, while they may feel that later-on they'll possibly have the ability to afford repairs if needed. Unfortunately surveys often also have caveats that the surveyor was unable to move furniture or raise carpets to look for possible problems - something an unscrupulous current owner may well be aware of.....
ReplyDeleteMost people go into house buying blind and just don't appreciate the true value of the survey as it can save so much money in the short term and applies mostly to old or converted properties. The cost of the survey has to be relative to the quality and depth of survey provided, and market forces are not really helping customers get the best out of the survey report provided.
ReplyDeleteBuyers of historic properties in conservation areas and statutorily listed should also check, or commission an historic buildings professional/planning consultant to check what alterations have been made, and that these have been done with the necessary listed buildings/ planning consents. Buyers pick up the financial and practical responsibility for reversing unauthorised works such as uPVC windows, plastic gutters or works -both internal and external- affecting the character of a listed building. Don't buy a pig in a poke. Dale Ingram MSc Historic Buildings Conservation and Planning Consultant, ConservationWorks.
ReplyDeleteI ought also to have said 'an accredited buildings surveyor with historic buildings experience may have the necessary expertise him/herself, or can recommend a suitable professional to help. Dale Ingram
ReplyDelete