A Mortgage Lender’s Valuation is for
the lender only and should not be relied upon by a purchaser as a means of
accurately assessing the condition of a property
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk |
Buying and selling of
property can be one of the most daunting experiences of our lives. The complex process of dealing with
Solicitors, Surveyors, Estate Agents, Mortgage Providers, Vendors (the person/s
selling the property) and the like is something that the vast majority of us do
not undertake on a regular basis, and is therefore something that often proves
to be very stressful. First time buyers
in particular will often feel overwhelmed by the whole process and will rely heavily
on their advisors to guide them through the process. Once a decision has been made to purchase a
property, buyers will work out their finances and decide how much they can
afford to borrow and then try to secure a mortgage or at least a mortgage
guarantee before beginning the process of house hunting.
For most of us
purchasing a property will be the largest financial investment we will make in
our lives. It is therefore essential that
we know exactly what we are buying before we exchange contracts because
it is at this point that a property comes into your legal ownership. At
exchange of contracts the law assumes that you have made all of your enquiries
and that you are fully aware of what you were buying. If subsequently you find problems with the
property, then these problems become your responsibility to deal with (unless
you feel that you have been advised inappropriately and that you can prove
this). It is therefore advisable to be as thorough as you can be to establish
the full extent of any issues with a property before you exchange contracts. A range of different surveys can be carried
out during the conveyance process for which the inexperienced, particularly first
time buyers often do not understand the purpose or scope of the range of
different surveys available. For clarity,
this article will consider conveyance in respect of a residential dwelling.
Source: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk |
Firstly, if you
apply for a mortgage, a valuation inspection will be carried out by the lender on the
property you are considering purchasing.
Do not be misled by this inspection.
This is for the lender and not the purchaser. The purpose of the
inspection is for the lender to be satisfied that in the event that you default in
some way on your repayments then in a ‘worse case scenario’ they will be able
to sell the property and re-coup the money they have borrowed to you. This is all about the lender assessing their
risk. These types of inspections are not
intrusive and in fact they are extremely brief and in most cases are completed
in approximately 20 to 30 minutes. The ‘Valuation Surveyor’ will make a brief internal inspection looking in the roof space if
possible (usually from the top of a ladder). The inspection will also look for visible
signs of timber decay or woodworm, and also consider the electrical
installation amongst other things. This
will be followed by an equally brief external inspection where the roof,
chimneys, external walls etc will be inspected.
As the Surveyor undertakes the inspection, a two or three page proforma,
mainly consisting of tick boxes will be completed. The ‘report’ will then be returned to the
lender and will identify whether the property is worth the agreed sale price and
also detail any urgent remedial works. It
is from this report that the lender will decide whether they will borrow the
agreed amount to the buyer or withhold a certain amount (as retention) for any
works the surveyor has identified as affecting the value of the property. I have a personal dislike for these types of
surveys because in my opinion surveyors are far too cautious in what they
report. They often recommend timber and damp surveys and electrical inspections
as standard without any real grounds for doing so, and often inaccurately
report other issues. This is hardly surprising given the very brief inspection undertaken, however this cautious approach is more likely to be a result of the
litigious World we now live in, where Surveyors provide ‘their own safety net’, and therefore try to reduce the risk of being sued. To a certain extent this is understandable,
but this should never be at the expense of accurate reporting.
I have recently
bought and sold a property. The Valuation Surveyor
for the lender of the prospective purchaser of my former house reported damp
problems and an issue with the chimney.
A timber and damp survey was recommended (by the surveyor) with a £1000
retention sum for repairs to the chimney.
The prospective purchaser tried to use this to negotiate a reduction on
the asking price, however as a Chartered Building Surveyor I knew that this was
completely inaccurate and unnecessary. I
tried to challenge this, however as it was not my lender (it was the purchasers
of my house), I continually hit a brick wall.
My purchaser became unnecessarily nervous about buying a house which
they now thought was riddled with damp and with a chimney that was about to
collapse! In the end, and to ensure that we did not lose the sale, through
gritted teeth, I agreed to a £500 reduction, even though this was completely
unnecessary. I am sure that many reading
this will have similar experiences, which I am also sure is one of the reasons
why some property transactions fall through at the last minute, which is extremely
frustrating.
This demonstrates
that lenders rely on the advice of surveyors who carry out such a brief
inspection that it is almost laughable, who then recommend further inspections and
remedial works that are often not necessary. Remember, a mortgage lender’s valuation is for
the lender only and should not be relied upon by a purchaser (mainly for the
reasons stated above), as a means of accurately assessing the condition of a
property. A much more comprehensive
inspection is therefore required and I would recommend that a Building Surveyor
is instructed to undertake a full, comprehensive survey of a property prior to
contracts being exchanged. Although this
will have a cost attached to it, you will often find that a building survey
will prove to be extremely cost effective as it will highlight possible
defects/issues which can either be used to negotiate the sale price, or
possibly allow the buyer the choice of pulling out of the sale, before
contracts are exchanged. This is something I will discuss in next week’s
article.
Please feel free to share this article and
other articles on this site with friends, family and colleagues who you
think would be interested
Information/opinions
posted on this site are the personal views of the author and should not be
relied upon by any person or any third party without first seeking further
professional advice. Also, please scroll down and read the copyright
notice at the end of the blog.
Great article again, especially where a surveyor will recommend a damp and timber survey. So the surveyor we will assume has attended college/University, studied buildings and defects for 3-5 years with some practical experience thrown in, get awarded a degree or similar qualification. They then advise a damp survey that will be carried out by someone who has attended a 3 day course on chemical injection and pesticides that results in a certificate of completion if they tick the right boxes. In my opinion the surveyor is negligent for recommending someone to carry out a Survey with less qualifications/experience than he/she has !!! Therefore what is the point of being called a Building Surveyor if you have to shift blame. I thought you had to be responsible for your actions and carry PI if a genuine mistake is made !!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed this post.
ReplyDelete