When you see cracking in a building it will not always be,
in-fact is very rarely likely to be subsidence.
This can only be established through a comprehensive building survey and
detailed investigations
 |
| Source: http://www.subsidenceforum.org.uk/ |
Whilst inspecting buildings I have learned over the years to
be very cautious in the terminology I use in the presence of Clients because
there are some words that just provoke panic.
Take asbestos for example, or cracking or even subsidence. These words strike fear into many people
mainly as a result of what they have seen on the news or read in the
media. It is fair to say that sometimes
these fears can be realised if any of the above examples are found to be
present/occurring in a building, however in the vast majority of cases, these
issues can be dealt with relatively easily.
This is generally a result of a lack of real understanding, which is why
it is always advisable to seek professional advice from a Building Surveyor or
Structural Engineer.
When I
first graduated from University I joined a Property Consultancy who’s main area
of business was dealing with subsidence insurance claims as Loss
Adjusters. My role was to visit site
with a more experienced Structural Engineer, who would make an initial
assessment, and then I would be required to manage the claim to a
conclusion. This often involved crack
monitoring to establish whether any movement was historic (had now stopped) or
progressive (was still continuing). This
was a crucial part of the process as it is pointless dealing with the effect of
subsidence until movement has been stopped.
On the occasions where movement was found to be progressive, it was
often first necessary to undertake substantial remedial work such as underpinning
to stabilise the building. In these
instances the whole process could be lengthy and disruptive for the residents
and in some instances required temporarily decanting of the occupants to
alternative accommodation for the duration of the works. Most home insurance policies will cover the
risk of subsidence and incorporate an excess payment in the region of £1000
(always check the wording of your policy because there can be variations). This demonstrates that the effects of
subsidence can be disruptive and even though it may be covered by home
insurance it can still be expensive.
 |
| Source: http://www.geoconsult.co.nz/ |
The
above scenario provides an example of what can happen at one end of the scale, however
as already stated the vast majority of subsidence claims I managed were dealt
with quickly and with minimal disruption, many proving not to be subsidence at
all. When undertaking building surveys,
a Surveyor will not just identify where and why subsidence has occurred, but
also look for indicators that may contribute to subsidence in the future. Before providing you with details of what I
would look for during a survey (this will be provided in part 2 of the article),
I think it is important to first understand exactly what subsidence actually
is.
Building
design should involved careful consideration of the type/load of the building,
the type of foundation used and ground bearing capacity and nature of the
ground, the height of the water table and so on. These types of investigations should help to
ensure that once the building is complete and occupied that it does not
sink! Subsidence however is not the same
as settlement. Settlement usually occurs in new or relatively new buildings.
As buildings are very heavy they cause the ground to compact, although this
will usually stop after a short period of time. Also, most buildings are constructed in a
variety of materials, all of which need to settle and have different rates of
shrinkage. Subsidence occurs when for
some reason the load bearing capacity of the ground that a building is placed
upon is no longer capable of accommodating that load. The reasons for the change is the load
bearing capacity can occur for many different reasons and many years after the
building was first completed. It is
quite feasible for a building to sit quite happily on a piece of ground for
many years and due to some of the influences discussed it part 2 of this
article, it can start to move.
Cracking in buildings occurs for
many different reasons so it is fundamentally important that anyone who
undertakes inspections or gives advice in respect of cracking should not make
rash judgements and should gather all of the evidence before arriving at a
possible cause. In order to aid the inspector, which as stated
previously, can be a Building Surveyor or Structural Engineer, it might be
necessary to recommend other investigations such as geo-technical surveys to
establish ground type, composition, contaminants etc., trial holes to establish
foundation depths, CCTV inspection of the drainage system and possibly
an arboricultural survey to give advice on any trees that may be an
influencing factor. The choice of which investigations are needed will be
decided once the inspector has made an initial assessment of the cracking. Therefore when you see cracking in a building
it will not always be, in-fact is very rarely likely to be subsidence. This can only be established through a
comprehensive building survey and detailed investigations.
In part 2 of this article (next
week) I will discuss subsidence in more detail and provide information in respect of the
things a Building Surveyor will look at to identify when and how subsidence is
occurring and indicators that may suggest that subsidence can occur in the
future.
Please feel free to share this article
and other articles on this site with friends, family and colleagues who
you think would be interested
Information/opinions posted on
this site are the personal views of the author and should not be relied upon by
any person or any third party without first seeking further professional
advice. Also, please scroll down and read the copyright notice at the
end of the blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment